Stating what should be obvious

Humbert Humbert is not a role model.

About these ads
This entry was posted in gender. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Stating what should be obvious

  1. Oh dear. No, I agree. But he is, um, sympathetic.

  2. Perhaps the most problematic feature of _Lolita_ is how “sympathetic” HH is, because the reader’s identification with his sickness draws one too far into the sick recesses of our culture and makes it impossible for some to realize that it is a devastating psycho-social critique, not a piece of erotica/porn.

    (As with others of N’s books, it’s important to never take the narrator’s account of anything at face value.)

  3. I agree that it’s problematic, but it’s also part of what can make the book great. Great is perhaps not the right word, but HH as unreliable, sick but sympathetic narrator is part of what makes that book more than erotica. For an aware reader able to see the critique and make the leaps, the moments of identification with HH are completely devastating–the psycho-social critique turns back out onto the reader in a way that is totally brutal.

    Or you could be a stupid asshole and think of it all as just erotica.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s